It may be that philosophy's sisyphean task is to try and answer unanswerable questions. Maybe this is where it's vitality comes from, providing endless challenge to the most curious human minds. By failing to directly answer 'the big questions' a fertile and creative intellectual realm where humans can strive to be 'better' (whatever that is).
I cannot see that the philosophy of time is one of these places. Ok, at least the portion of it trying to describe the nature of time. We only can access our experience of time and whatever the reality of it is seems to be irrelevant. Furthermore, I don't think we can access any evidence on weather time is this way or that, because we are limited by our subjective view of the universe.
I cannot see that the philosophy of time is one of these places. Ok, at least the portion of it trying to describe the nature of time. We only can access our experience of time and whatever the reality of it is seems to be irrelevant. Furthermore, I don't think we can access any evidence on weather time is this way or that, because we are limited by our subjective view of the universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment